Article

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review – Time to Reflect

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating
Copyright Statement:

The copyright in this work belongs to Radcliffe Medical Media. Only articles clearly marked with the CC BY-NC logo are published with the Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. The CC BY-NC option was not available for Radcliffe journals before 1 January 2019. Articles marked ‘Open Access’ but not marked ‘CC BY-NC’ are made freely accessible at the time of publication but are subject to standard copyright law regarding reproduction and distribution. Permission is required for reuse of this content.

As this year draws to a close, it seems an appropriate time to reflect on the progress of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review during 2014.

An increased issue frequency compared with previous years has meant a rise in the number of manuscripts published, from 11 in 2012, to 23 in 2013, and rising to 32 in 2014.

All of the review articles that have appeared in the journal have passed through at least one round of double-blind peer review, with the average time from initial submission to first decision of 26 days. Most papers then undergo minor or major revision and at least one further round of peer review (just four papers were accepted without revision). I then conduct a final review of all papers myself before their final acceptance and publication. The average time from submission to acceptance of published papers in 2014 has been 10 weeks. The support of the journal’s peer review board and members of the wider cardiology community who have been called on to review papers in their specialist areas, and the authors who have worked with them to develop and refine their papers, have been integral to the success of the peer-review process.

Three issues of Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review are planned next year – to be published in April, August and November 2015. We hope to publish an increasing number of articles online first, to create a steady flow of new, relevant content to the journal’s website, www.aerjournal.com.

Thank you for your contribution as readers, reviewers and authors, which has been essential to the success of the journal in 2014. We look forward to your continuing support over the coming year.